DiversityHuman.com - It's all about us. It's all about you!

apollo_11.png

Conspiracy

The greatest Hoax of All Time: Moon landing conspiracy


Do you know the most expensive movie ever made in the history of mankind? Let us re-investigate the most extraordinary event of 20th century - man landing on the moon. The highest budgeted film of all time ( conspiracy).

I will elaborate some conspiracy theories and we will rationalize their own interpretation on some scientific observations they made. We will examine photographic film images and we'll take note of some critical testimonies from retired NASA personnel and even astronauts. Analyze the evidence and decide for yourself.

Around four decades has passed and still 20 percent of American citizens still don't have faith on the allege moon landing. They claimed that NASA could have covered it up and orchestrated the deception of the century. July 16, 1969. America held its breath upon the start of the ignition sequence of Apollo 11 until its lift off and marked the start of a 250,000-mile journey to the moon (eight-day voyage). A trip for three astronauts into the alien world. Millions of people watched and followed every updates from the NASA's command center until Neil Armstrong has declared "Houston, Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed." apollo_11.png

But did the eagle really land on the moon?

Bill Kaysing, the designer of the Apollo rocket was skeptic. "What was being shown was not real", Kaysing said. How did this happen? If it was unreal, where did the photos and videos come from? Is it entirely possible to fake the landing?

There was a rumor that the first to land on the moon wins the cold war between USSR and USA. If we would date back 10 years before the Apollo landing, in October 4, 1957 Russia sent Sputnik to space, the first satellite to be in orbit. There were speculations in US that it carried missiles or bombs that can be dropped anytime in New York. However, Russia denied this issue.

NASA was struggling their research in space technology and obviously far behind from Russia. There were many failures including deaths of NASA's astronauts in their first few attempts to launch their rockets. However, the federal government was pushing NASA to send a human to the man and this gave birth to the $40 billion USD fund allocated for the voyage of Apollo 11. United States could not afford to lose the space race. With that said, if NASA was having troubles to make it, then they faked it. Brian o'Leary narrated that it is possible that NASA wanted to cut corners and to be the first to go to the moon.

Bill Kaysing is one of the most famous proponents of the moon landing conspiracy. Here are some of the inconsistencies he found out.

1. Photos are not showing stars in the background. According to him, missing stars in the black lunar sky is impossible. The sun is the major light source but the stars from the background should have been captured as it also reflects light towards the moon surface.
2. Flags waving. Bill said that flag was waving without air is a fallacy.
3. No blast crater beneath the lunar lander. He compared NASA illustration of the an engine used for the ascent of a rocket from the launchpad here on earth against what has been shown in the photos from the moon landing. Bill explained that the rocket engine is so powerful enough to create a blast crater but it didn't.
4. The suspicious ascend of the Lunar Excursion Module (LEM) from the lunar surface. Vertically popping up from the the surface is questionable. He speculated that there were cables pulling off the LEM from the ground and lifting it all the way up. He proposed that the filming of the landing was done in Nevada desert known as Area 51. The most heavily guarded facility in United States. Russian satellites images shown barren areas that looks like the moon's environment. Even astronauts acknowledged the similarities.
crater.png
5. NASA photos are doctored. There were so many anomalies and technical manipulation of photos. Images were staged, Bill added. In some photos, cross hairs appeared behind the objects which they said is the result of bad editing.
cross_hair.png
6. Lighting. The moon's light source is the sun. But the shadows are in all directions and the shadows intersect. Bill said that this can only be possible when there are multiple light sources.
multiple_light_source.png
7. Superimposed videos (compositing). After thorough inspection of NASA's videos, Bill found some flaws and he claimed that there were many captured films that were identical in nature and was filmed in same location.
8. The cameras were not easy to control. All cameras were attached to the astronaut's space suit and there is no viewfinder, the astronaut can not bend their heads to look at the camera, but how come that they captured awesome photos with precised framing, crisp and clarity? From the photo below, the 'United States' is obviously clear.
words_crisp_USA.png
9. A very vivid capture of an object behind a shadow. If the sun is on the opposite direction and the astronaut is behind the LEM with shadow casting all over him, he should not be clearly seen on the still photo.
at_the_darkness_but_austronaut_is_so_clear.png
10. Complex design of LEM. Neil Armstrong struggled in maneuvering the lander when it was tested in the controlled environment of Earth. The lander was so unstable to control. According to the LEM designer, when you move just an inch inside that cabin, load pattern will change and it would tilt and it would spin in which such event almost took the life of Neil Armstrong when he was testing it.
11. Deadly radiation belt. 500 miles above the earth is an intense radiation called Van Allen radiation belt which is composed of cosmic rays and solar particles. This is a thousand miles of thickness. The magnetic storms from the sun increases the intensity of the radiation belt. During the flight of Apollo 11, one of the heaviest radiations from Van Allen belt was recorded. How did they survive the trip? The astronaut's suit was only an inch thick of aluminum fiber. According to Bill, 6-ft of shielding is required to protect the astronauts. Moreover, the space suits were not designed to extreme changes of temperature. The space suits has been exposed to +250 and -250 degrees Celsius. Russians did not even bother to go the alien environment as they were afraid of not being able to come back to Earth.

In spite of these strong evidences, NASA dismisses these charges. To conclude this article, please watch the Mythbuster's video.

DiversityHuman

Blog info

Author

DiversityHuman

Babaeng May Mabuting Kalooban Hinahangaan Ng Mga Sundalo Sa Jollibee Borongan Eastern Samar

Random Act Of Kindness: Man In Cebu Shares Generator To Entire Village For FREE!

Filipino Earns Around 1 Million Per Month In Selling Isaw, Betamax, & Adidas In New York City

This Boy Inspires Strangers But Can You Hold Your Tears While Reading His Story?

Page top